Athletic minds!

March 28 2025

In the vein of a recent post concerning the audacity of people selecting “athletic” for body type and whether or not this should be reserved for those who are indeed athletic or those that fit someone’s list of what an athletic body looks like I, as an amateur sapiosexual have been lamenting why there isn’t a profile field for Intelligence and if there was what should be the choices?
- Einstein
- highly evolved and can’t stand stupidity
- quite smart but plays nicely with the dim
- learned to read and write but don’t like doing much of either
- oh look tits, arse, pussy, cock!
- Uggg

Please discuss or not because tits arse pussy cock 🤭

Comments

  • FeistyFatty

    FeistyFatty

    a year ago

    Someone's self appraisal of their intellect will surely be more unreliable than people's assessment of their body types. Waste of a category.

  • NeoAndTrin

    NeoAndTrin

    a year ago

    Lowest level should be
    "Make America Great Again"

  • boobsandbusted

    boobsandbusted

    a year ago

    True Genius here ,but can’t type without glasses and forgets glasses all the time just to annoy people ,😂

  • touchbase

    touchbase

    a year ago

    🤣 gold... need select all a option, can relate to all but depends on day of the week sometimes.

  • Ex007

    Ex007

    a year ago

    Intelligence is often a deeply introspective experience, making it difficult to measure accurately without some form of formal assessment.

    There are also many different types of intelligence, each with its own unique strengths.

    Linguistic Intelligence
    Logical-Mathematical Intelligence
    Musical Intelligence
    Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence
    Spatial Intelligence
    Interpersonal Intelligence
    Intrapersonal Intelligence
    Naturalistic Intelligence
    Existential Intelligence

    Because intelligence is so multifaceted, personal opinions or perceptions (while valid) can only offer a limited view.

    Without the guidance of a structured test or questionnaire, our understanding of someone’s intelligence remains largely incomplete.

  • Brian_Breynolds

    Brian_Breynolds

    a year ago

    Haha, maybe a good feature would be to have the ability to set a small quiz for someone before they can message you.

    I find the different metrics on here a bit ridiculous to be honest. Especially the subjective ones like looks, body type, and personality. I'd say a listing of "very attractive" is less of a measure of ones looks than it is of ones narcissism.

    I do think the categories of sexual attraction style could be good though. Then we'd be able to filter for sapiosexual, demisexual, etc.

  • MsSuperFoxy

    MsSuperFoxy

    a year ago

    Soooo, does an elegant cock, with substance count??

    Ms Foxy 🤭

  • HotAppitite

    HotAppitite

    a year ago

    Maybe....... 🤔
    If you just read somebody's profile, You may get a bit of an indication as the weather or not.
    Your dealing with a dumb ass 🤷‍♀️ For example-

    Has Nothing Written on their profile?......Probably a dumb ass.
    Has a stupid fake, AI generated profile picture......
    Probably a dumb ass.
    Their entire description consists of 2 elements. They like to have fun, 🥳 And They love please & Won't stop till their asked 🙄 ..... bullshit.
    Or you'll finished first & go to sleep 🤣
    Sorry, it shits me. Every second guy, has that on their profile 🤷‍♀️
    it's like the RHP app assisted them to generate a shitty intro. Yawn

    I think If they can string together a sentence and don't look like a dropped pie, it's a good fucken start....... I know, I know....Lower your expectations Woman 🤣🤣 Hey I'm needy 🤷‍♀️
    Whatever 😏
    Could possibly try something wild and dangerous like sending them a message? Or a like 🎣.....
    If you're lucky you might even get a response from the main brain not the other head......👇🙄.

    If it's all going well from there, you can go to the next level, & invite them for a drink, 🥂
    Are they capable of doing what.they say? ....Do, they have the intelligence to even turn up, Or did they leave you sitting there looking like the dumb ass.

    Then if you want to get really technical .....categories 🤔........ My vote is for-

    ❇️Adult sized toddler ( This would be the dumb asses we spoke about earlier, Or, if you're at work , there's probably several around you right now. Sssh. 🤫..... it's like The 6th sence....... They don't know,they are dumb 🤷‍♀️)

    ❇️School of hard knocks ( probably street smart , mostly self educated & Uses sarcasm because they don't suffer fools well & can see right through the BS 🤓)

    ❇️ Superior being ( Or, to us mere mortals..... FIGJAM! 💣💥 They Are all that, and then some!
    Not shy in reminding you..... frequently)

    Well, there's my 2 cents worth 🪙🪙
    hope my contribution is of assistance 😉

  • RHP User

    RHP User

    a year ago

    Athletic and Fit have completely different definitions. A gym git person might not be fit enough to play any sports and someone who plays cricket all day might not be defined as fit by you. Similarly, athletic could mean different to different people.

    I know of a friend who is a gym freak, fit as a fiddle, but you ask him to play a sports, and he gets tired in 5 mins. So a def of fit and athletic would defer based on their own definitions.

    Just my opinion, not trying to argue or debate please.

  • NottingHill

    NottingHill

    a year ago

    I’ve found that the most intelligent people, or those at least with high EQ, also tend to be the most modest. They tend to want not to be perceived as an arrogant know it all.

    Because of that, I like to look at the people who categorise themselves as ‘average’. (And yes, I get the irony that I’ve put myself in that category).

  • Vixennstag

    Vixennstag

    a year ago

    I agree with Notting Hill and add that those with the athletic body selected are usually not so much and have pictures that don't match their current look. My conservative description of my masculine Dad bod has got me absolutely nowhere but it is way better than being a flog 🤣🤣👌

  • Eddie691

    Eddie691

    a year ago

    This is a actually a great idea. Matching on an intellectual level is definitely a requirement for any kind of lasting worthwhile friendship (with or without benefits).

  • RHP User

    RHP User

    a year ago

    I think that would be a good thing to have on a person's profile and from knowing you in chat i can see the reason for the question in searching for potential playmates if you had a field which represented "chat personality" and i saw sapiosexual i would deffo send a message as i like chatting and i get turned in by interesting convo :)